Advertising Law Cases for lawyers who specialize in advertisement law - including in-house counsel and outside counsel.

Welcome to JLCom Publishing Co., LLC's Advertising Law Cases Area. This area contains links to a growing list of federal court decisions in the advertising law, marketing law and commercial speech areas.

Selected Federal Court Decisions in Advertising Law, Marketing Law and Commercial Speech

44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, U.S. Supreme Court, 517 U.S. 484, May 13, 1996.
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York, U.S. Supreme Court, 447 U.S. 557, No. 79-565, June 20, 1980.
Edenfield v. Fane, U.S. Supreme Court, 123 L. Ed. 2d 543, 113 S. Ct. 1792, 1798 (1993).
Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. (No. 84-1903), 478 U.S. 328 (1986).
Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co., U.S. Supreme Court, (93-1631), 514 U.S. 476 (1995).
United States v. Edge Broadcasting, U.S. Supreme Court, (92-486), 509 U.S. 418 (1993).
Nutraceutical Corporation v. Eschenbach, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, August 17, 2006.

Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc., No. 02-15035, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, September 2, 2003.
Robert E. Rice, v. Fox Broadcasting Company, et al., No. 01-56582, No. 01-56846, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, May 29, 2003.
Societe des Hotels Meridien, Meridien, S.A., et al. v. Lasalle Hotel Operating Partnership, L.P., et al., 02 Civ. 4090 (JSM), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, August 19, 2002.
Sally Beauty Company, Inc., et al. v. Beautyco, Inc., Nos. 01-6049 and 01-6075, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, September 3, 2002.
GEORGE M. WEAVER, et al. v. ALICE D. BONNER, et al., No. 00-15158, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, October 18, 2002.
JUNE TONEY v. L'OREAL USA, INC., et al., No. 02 C 3002, U.S. District Court for the Norhtern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, November 1, 2002.
PATRICIA C. ANDERSON, et al. v. ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL, et al., Docket No. 01-7954, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, April 4, 2002, Argued June 25, 2002, Decided.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC. v. 1-800 CONTACTS, INC., et al., No. 02-10322, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, July 29, 2002, Decided July 29, 2002, Filed.
FTC v. MEDICOR, LLC, et al., Defendants, No. CV 01-1896 CBM (Ex), U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, July 18, 2002, Decided July 18, 2002, Filed; July 19, 2002, Entered.
NATIONAL DISTILLERS PRODUCTS CO., LLC v. REFRESHMENT BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants, 00 Civ. 8418 (NRB), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, July 29, 2002, Decided July 30, 2002, Filed.
IQ PRODUCTS COMPANY v. PENNZOIL PRODUCTS CO., et al., No. 01-20764, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, September 23, 2002, Decided.
PEPSICO, INC. v. STEPHEN RICHARD PLANK, et al., Case No. CV 02-02476 NM (RZx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, July 18, 2002, Decided July 18, 2002, Filed; July 17, 2002.
PERRY J. BINGHAM, D.D.S., et al. v. CATHLEEN HAMILTON, et al., CIV. S-99-0499 DFL JFM, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, May 15, 2000.
MASON v. FLORIDA BAR, No. 99-2138, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 208 F.3d 952; 13 Fla. Law W. Fed. C 560, April 6, 2000.
S.C. JOHNSON & SON v. THE CLOROX CO., 99 Civ. 11079 (TPG), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, April 19, 2000.
SCHERING CORPORATION v. PFIZER INC. and UCB PHARMA, INC., 98 Civ. 7000 (LMM), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, May 24, 2000, As Corrected June 1, 2000.
SIGN-A-WAY, INC. v. MECHTRONICS CORPORATION, 98-1491, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6230, April 5, 2000.
SMART INVENTIONS, Inc. v. ALLIED COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., CASE NO.: CV 00-00780 ABC, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, 94 F. Supp. 2d 1060; March 21, 2000.
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC. v. BLEEM, LLC, et al., No. 99-17137, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 54 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1753; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3491; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4787; May 4, 2000.

WHO WE ARE

JLCom Publishing Co., LLC is the publisher of Advertising Compliance ServiceÔ. For over 26 years, Advertising Compliance ServiceÔ has been the authoritative, comprehensive source of information for advertising lawyers as well as advertisers and advertising agencies--and their attorneys--in the advertising law area. In-house counsel and outside counsel alike regularly rely on Advertising Compliance ServiceÔ because it is must-reading for every attorney who advises clients on advertising and marketing issues. One of the 27 areas regularly covered by this newsletter/reference service is found in Tab #10, "Commercial Speech".

Our Related Websites

Advertising Compliance Service | Advertising Substantiation
Ad Substantiation | Political Advertising Law

Lawyers who specialize in marketing law - including in-house counsel and outside counsel - need to know the latest cases involving commercial speech.

© Copyright 2007-2008 JLCom Publishing Co., L.L.C. All rights reserved.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The materials included in this Web Site are intended for general information purposes only and are not intended to provide, and do not constitute, legal or other advice. Persons who need legal or other services should contact a duly licensed professional. The inclusion of links on this website are to web sites maintained by third parties over whom JLCom Publishing Co., LLC has no control. Such links do not imply endorsement of the material contained therein. JLCom Publishing Co., LLC makes no claims, representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or appropriateness of these websites or the information these websites contain. Read this disclaimer and our privacy statement before using this site.