NOTE: Here is where you can find advertising law information based on news briefs that appeared in past issues of Advertising Compliance Service, "Your Single Essential Advertising Law Resource," during the month of February 1998.
FTC has OK'd as final a consent agreement with Beylen Telecom Ltd., NiteLine Media, Inc., and Ron Tan (also known as Roeun Tan), an officer of NiteLine Media, settles charges that the firms falsely advertised that using their special "viewer" would be "free." Also, FTC charged that the firms' computer program surreptitiously disconnected consumers from their local Internet service provider and reconnected their computer modems to the Internet through an international telephone call, all without their knowledge because the program also turned off their modem speakers so that they could not hear the disconnect or the dialing of the international number. FTC alleged that Beylen Telecom Ltd. provided the "viewer" software and other "means and instrumentalities" to defraud consumers. FTC also alleged that both companies caused consumers to pay inflated phone rates to Moldova when their calls actually connected to Canada. The proposed settlement includes the payment of redress funds to AT&T and MCI, which will issue credits to their customers who were billed for the calls, and to FTC, which will issue refunds to customers of other long-distance carriers who were billed for the calls.
NOTE: A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of $11,000.
(Beylen Telecom Ltd., et al., FTC Dkt. No. 972 3128, February 6, 1998; materials relating to this FTC matter are available on the Internet at FTC's World Wide Web site at: http://www.ftc.gov.)
On February 13, 1998--as part of its ongoing effort to review and revise all of its rules--FTC published in the Federal Register amendments to its Rules and Regulations under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, the Wool Products Labeling Act, and the Fur Products Labeling Act. In general, the products covered by the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, the Wool Products Labeling Act, and the Fur Products Labeling Act and regulations must be labeled as to fiber or fur content; country of origin; and manufacturer or dealer identity. The changes to the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and the Wool Products Labeling Act Rules will streamline the disclosure requirements in the following ways:
(Regulatory Reform Update, February 13, 1998; materials relating to this FTC matter are available on the Internet at FTC's World Wide Web site at: http://www.ftc.gov.)
On February 12, 1998, FTC's General Counsel testified before a House Committee and presented the agency's assessment of its compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which requires agencies to consider the impact of their rules and proposed rules on small businesses and other small entities. In testimony before the House Small Business Committee, Debra A. Valentine, speaking on behalf of the Commission, said FTC has made regulatory review and reform a high priority and has adopted an aggressive, comprehensive regulatory review program that not only meets but exceeds the requirements of the RFA. "Altogether, one-third of the Commission's rules and guides in the 1992 Code of Federal Regulations have been revoked and another 25% revised," according to her testimony. Valentine noted that by the end of this fiscal year the Commission expects to have reviewed over 80% of the rules and guides existing in 1992.
According to her testimony, the Commission in 1995 "accelerated its regulatory review process and adopted streamlined procedures" in order to review rules that may have outlived their useful purpose. Valentine pointed out that as a result of the agency's regulatory reform program, the Commission has repealed 13 rules to date (more than 30 percent of those in effect in 1992). Also, 15 of FTC's 40 industry guides have been repealed as obsolete and others have been revised or consolidated, Valentine said.
(FTC Release, FTC File No. P 859 907, February 12, 1998; materials relating to this FTC matter are available on the Internet at FTC's World Wide Web site at: http://www.ftc.gov.)
January | February | March | April | May | June
July | August | September | October | November | December
© Copyright 1998-2016 JLCom Publishing Co., L.L.C. All rights reserved.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Materials included in this Web Site are intended for general information purposes only and are not intended to provide - and do not constitute - legal or other advice. Persons who need legal or other services should contact a duly licensed professional. Inclusion of links on this Web Site are to Web Sites maintained by third parties over whom JLCom Publishing Co., LLC has no control. Such links do not imply endorsement of the material that is contained therein. JLCom Publishing Co., LLC makes no claims, representations, or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or appropriateness of these Web Sites or the information these websites contain. Read this disclaimer and our privacy statement before using this site.